翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Re Shoe Lace Ltd
・ Re Sigma Finance Corp
・ Re Smith & Fawcett Ltd
・ Re Spectrum Plus Ltd
・ Re T&D Industries plc
・ Re the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill
・ Re Therrien
・ Re Tottenham Hotspur plc
・ Re Transbus International Ltd
・ Re Tuck's Settlement Trusts
・ Re Umberto (Turin Metro)
・ Re Umberto-class ironclad
・ Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd
・ Re Vandervell Trustees Ltd (No 2)
・ Re Voltere
Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally
・ Re West Sussex Constabulary's Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts
・ Re Wragg Ltd
・ Re Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd
・ Re Yeovil Glove Co Ltd
・ Re!
・ Re'eh
・ Re'em
・ Re'em Ha'Cohen
・ Re'im
・ Re, Norway
・ Re, Piedmont
・ Re, Sogn og Fjordane
・ Re-ac-tor
・ Re-act


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally : ウィキペディア英語版
Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally

''Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally'' was a significant case decided in the High Court of Australia on 17 June 1999. The case concerned the constitutional validity of cross-vesting of jurisdiction, in particular, the vesting of state companies law jurisdiction in the Federal Court.
==Background==
As part of the national corporations law scheme instigated after the High Court's ruling in ''New South Wales v The Commonwealth'' (1990) the states were required to legislate for the formation of corporations. As a result of this the states had to vest the Federal Court with state jurisdiction to allow the Commonwealth to have effective judicial control over corporations law.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.